MPAA sues LokiTorrent PDF Print
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

LokiTorrent is yet another BitTorrent site to be targeted in the MPAA crush p2p, sue file sharers vendetta.

The Big Seven movie studios claim they’re being ruined by file sharing and that thousands of ancillary staff are suffering terrible hardships as a direct result.

And yet, at the same time, they’re reporting mind-boggling revenues. For a taste, check out the Big Earners list.

One film, Titanic, raked in more than half a billion dollars and this year, in June alone, the North American movie industry took in $1.03 billion, a 14% increase over June 2003's previous monthly record.

Now LokiTorrent is looking for $30,000 to go towards, “legal and other costs associated with saving peer-to-peer as a whole".

Dominate online environments
The MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) attacks against BitTorrent servers are part of a concerted effort involving the major software companies, record labels and movie studios to dominate online environments in order to turn them into tightly controlled corporate marketing and sales divisions and enterprises.

Of Suprnova.org, Youceff.com, Lokitorrent.com and Piratebay.org, four popular torrent sites mentioned by Johan Pouwelse in The Bittorrent P2P File-sharing System: Measurements and Analysis, only Piratebay.org escaped the MPAA’s direct attention.

We say ‘direct’ because although Piratebay.org hasn’t yet been nailed like the other three sites, it was named in a lamentable MPAA effort to use the purely American DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) in an attempt to con site owners in foreign countries.

LokiTorrent's request for donations towards its legal costs epitomizes a major part of the entertainment industry strategy.

In the same way that the RIAA, the MPAA’s opposite number in the recording industry, is suing mom-and-pop p2p users, knowing full well that never in a million years will they be able to match the industry’s financial and legal resources, the studios are counting on the same thing happening with their sue ‘em all campaign.


Guilty until proven innocent
Not one of the RIAA’s (Recording Industry Association of America) thousands of victims has ever been found guilty of anything because they’ve never appeared in a court.

They’re all ordinary people who share music with each other not for profit but for pleasure. They’re not the hard-core crooks the members of the Big Four music label cartel portray them to be.

Big Music knows its victims will never be able to afford a court appearance. So it makes ‘settlement’ offers which, although the payments impoverish many of victims, they’re forced to accept.

This makes a mockery of the ‘innocent until proven guilty’ concept, allows the cartel to imply its successfully sued rafts of people for ‘illegally’ sharing files online, and wards off the possibility of a court actually hearing a case and deciding file sharing is not, after all, illegal.

In the meanwhile, the real criminals, the organized counterfeiters making their fortunes on world black markets because the labels, studios and software companies continue to churn out easily copied physical CDs and DVDs in their billions, as much as anything else, go largely unscathed.

And everything that applies to the music cartel sue ‘em all campaigns similarly applies to the movie industry onslaughts.


No clue
In The Netherlands, the major studios used their Brein anti-piracy enforcement unit against ED2K and Bittorrent sites.

As Raymond Blijd reported, Brein conned Holland’s FIOD-ECD, the government agency assigned to the criminal pursuit of fiscal, financial and economical fraud, into getting involved.

FIOD-ECD, “can by any constitutional means go after hard-core criminalism,” says Blijd, “So, getting access to and information from an ISP isn't an issue. Simply said, FIOD-ECD can do what Brein can't.”

FIOD-ECD got into it believing investigators would find servers loaded with illegal materials, and “neatly kept balance sheets showing the profits generated by all the 'illegal' activities”.

During interrogations, one investigator, “in obvious frustration, grabbed a random piece of PHP code and offered it up it as a scorecard for keeping tabs on funds. Finally, it became abundantly clear to all that FIOD-ECD were in way over their heads. They had no clue as to what they were dealing with.”

And the criminals they were chasing?

Suspects aged 18 to 26 and who, far from being members of an organized conspiracy set up to milk the industry of millions of dollars, barely knew each other and were surviving mostly on donations from site users.

In the meanwhile ------------

  • It's never been proven that a downloaded and/or shared file equals even a single a lost sale, let alone millions of them
  • RIAA claims that its war against file sharers is having a marked effect have proven to be spurious, and the same will certainly apply to the MPAA's efforts

Source: p2pnet.net.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: