|
Written by tinfoil
on
Friday, 22 September 2006 20:24
|
|
Recording Industry vs. The People: In UMG v. Lindor, the defendant Marie Lindor has made a motion
to preclude the RIAA from introducing into the case songs as to which
it has failed to produce the song files. Ms. Lindor's lawyers submitted
to the Court the RIAA's interrogatory responses where the record
companies had stated under oath that their case was based upon (a)
Media Sentry's detection of song files being 'distributed' and (b)
Media Sentry's allegedly making "perfect digital copies" of those
files. Ms. Lindor's attorneys argued that the RIAA cannot prove that it
made perfect digital copies of the songs if it doesn't have the song
files.
Notice of Motion*
Affidavit of Morlan Ty Rogers*
Opposition Affidavit of Richard L. Gabriel*
Memorandum of Law in Opposition*
Reply Affidavit of Morlan Ty Rogers*
Reply Memorandum of Law*
Exhibit A (Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's First Interrogatories)*
Exhibt B (Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Followup Interrogatories)*
|
